Thursday, July 1, 2010

The Language of Technology

When I was a freshman in college in 1993, my friends and I were amazed by this new thing called "email." We could write letters to each other over the computer! A few years later one of the reference librarians showed my class the nascent "world wide web." She showed us the Coca-Cola website and I remember thinking, so what? Why would I ever use this? To me, it seemed to be just another medium for advertising. I had no way of predicting the great impact it would have on my life, and on the entire world. I enjoy the many ways technology can enhance life--it often saves time, encourages creativity, and makes vast amounts of information available to anyone with an internet connection. It has given us such things as cell phones, iPods, Kindles, Google, Facebook, and Twitter.

However, I still have my reservations. Yes, it's much more convenient to communicate by email, but I miss getting good old fashioned letters. My mailbox has become purely a vessel for bills, credit card offers and weekly coupon mailers. Cell phones often impose themselves upon many social situations. They ring during meetings, dinners, and gatherings with friends. Last year I even attended a funeral that was interrupted three different times by someone's phone. Facebook is a great way to stay connected with friends--old and new. Yet, sometimes I wonder if I really need to know that a person I haven't seen in over fifteen years just got back from a dentist appointment.

While these are all important issues surrounding technology, my biggest concern is the effect it has on language, specifically American English. As an aspiring high school English teacher, these concerns will constantly inspire the way I choose incorporate technology into my classroom. In the context of today's society, I view words as an endangered species and grammar as possibly extinct. Phrases have given way to acronyms. We create faces out of punctuation marks. The shorthand of text messaging is expeditiously eating words, or at the very least, correctly spelled words.

Why is this important? Abbreviated language allows us to communicate at a swift pace. There is value in that. However, the loss of vocabulary leads to something much more profound. Without specific language, we become increasingly disconnected from our feelings and emotions. We lose our ability to communicate effectively. In our efforts to be "connected," perhaps we are actually more detached.

Technology, in itself, is not the direct cause of this phenomenon. Instead, I would suggest that it results from people using technology in a less than prudent way. Technology is only as effective as the person behind the keyboard, so to speak. It will not make an amateur artist Michelangelo nor will it make a middling teacher John Dewey. As a classroom teacher, I hope to incorporate technology into my practice in a way that truly enhances learning. I want my students view technology as a tool, not as a crutch. SparkNotes can help a student navigate his or her way through The Great Gatsby, but they are not a substitute for reading the book. Text messaging is a way to quickly communicate, but it does not replace the art of conversation. These types of lessons will hopefully cultivate a new generation of people who will not only use present technology effectively, but will be prepared to approach future innovations with shrewdness as well.

6 comments:

  1. I understand where you're coming from - I remember it took me a long time just to understand what "Google" was. A search engine? So? What do I need to search for? Of course, now I don't think I can live without it, which is a reflection on how much our world has changed. And I'm so with you on the cell phones thing - I just can't stand it when I'm hanging out with someone and they start texting with someone else. However, I occassionally find myself struggling not to do it myself! And Facebook? When people ask me why I still haven't gotten one, I jokingly tell them, "I'll be your friend in real life." So yes, I do believe we are enhancing the communication gap by making it so much more convenient to stay in touch. At the same time, I just love texting so much. I think the trick is to find a balance (as with everything in life, I suppose) and, as you suggest, use technology in a way that enhances and supports, rather than hinders or replaces.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jenson Ankle, you've made some great points here. Technology has changed our way of speaking, communicating--even thinking. I read an article in an educational journal not too long ago about how our brains have adapted to the multisensory experience of today's technology. We've got all these windows open and we're seeing them/understanding them in different ways all at once: AIM, facebook, google, wikipedia. There's ads and banners and things popping up all the time. One of the best and worst things about technology is that it is so ephemeral. It can change everything so quickly--and that's really hard for people who love language, who love history, who love all these different subjects. On the one hand, you're cool with the change because that's what the world does--that's what language does, that's what history does--but maybe we all need something to hold on to.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Look at the great conversation you've sparked...good work, JA! We only nodded in this direction during class, but one of the meatiest point/counterpoint topics on our roster of late has been "Is Chatspeak damaging our students' capacity to express themselves?" It's wonderfully rich, for reasons that you clearly grasp, and handled well it can turn our attention towards (believe it or not) age-old questions about the tension (or possible harmony) between popular culture and academic or school culture. For goodness sake, this was precisely the terrain in which our friend John Dewey was working over 100 years ago, so continuing the effort to make sense of this places us in a most honorable tradition. Welcome to the profession, JA ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Very well thought out points in this first blog. I often find myself texting with correct spelling and grammar, only to wince when I receive "OMG totally c u l8r 2nite k?" I cannot stand extensive abbreviation and I tend to use Chatspeak ironically.

    The internet was in its early childhood around the same time I was, so for me technology has always been around and the advances made sense. I learned how to type quickly via AIM and other instant messaging platforms. In school, I saw teachers who refused to integrate technology into their classrooms, scoffing at anything more advanced than PowerPoint. On the opposite side, I was fortunate enough to have some teachers who incorporated website building into projects so that we learned some of the programing behind the scenes, as well as teachers who applied for grants to increase the availability of new programs and computers.

    Having seen examples of effective technology integration and poor technology integration, I hope that this class will help be use the former for my students.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi, JA -- You said, "As a classroom teacher, I hope to incorporate technology into my practice in a way that truly enhances learning. I want my students view technology as a tool, not as a crutch." That's so important to realize at the start of your teaching career. After all, if tech *doesn't* improve learning, why spend the money on it? Thanks for your thoughts - looking forward to seeing where they lead you!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I completely understand your reservations on this. In fact, after quitting facebook I got into an argument with my mom about whether or not grad programs could require you to be a member. She said, "it's part of life now." I said, "But... we already have email, phones, ctools... so many other means to be reached." I ended up getting back on facebook a few months later but I hold out hope that we can teach kids that going the extra mile in terms of communication (writing that letter, typing out full words and learning new ones, reading books as well as blogs...) is worth it.

    ReplyDelete